Blog Feeds
06-06 12:50 PM
If you care about America's ability to compete in the years to come, you know that having a robust, well-functioning talent worker visa system is critical. One group with a great track record for work on creating such a system is Immigration Voice. They're sponsoring Immigration Voice Advocacy Days June 7th and 8th in Washington and I urge all readers able to participate to please do so. IV has nearly 400 meetings scheduled with members of Congress and the Obama Administration and this is a great opportunity to have your opinions heard by people who can make a major difference...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/06/join-immigration-voice-for-capitol-hill-visits-monday-and-tuesday.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/06/join-immigration-voice-for-capitol-hill-visits-monday-and-tuesday.html)
wallpaper love quotes and poems for
rm7302
03-22 10:49 PM
Hi,
I am planning to apply for Alberta Nomination Program under NOC (Manufacturing and Industrial Engineers). Does anybody has any experience with this NOC. Also, I need to know how does this process work. I apply for ANP and when I need to move I apply for jobs and then I get work permit...right ? Then if I need to get a TN visa to come back to usa how do I do that. I have a house in chicago, so wondering if renting that out could be an option for me when I immigrate to alberta so that when I need I can come to chicago. I am in my 5th year of H1B and with the current scenario my present company is not going to start my GC (it stopped because of layoffs in the company).
I am planning to apply for Alberta Nomination Program under NOC (Manufacturing and Industrial Engineers). Does anybody has any experience with this NOC. Also, I need to know how does this process work. I apply for ANP and when I need to move I apply for jobs and then I get work permit...right ? Then if I need to get a TN visa to come back to usa how do I do that. I have a house in chicago, so wondering if renting that out could be an option for me when I immigrate to alberta so that when I need I can come to chicago. I am in my 5th year of H1B and with the current scenario my present company is not going to start my GC (it stopped because of layoffs in the company).
Parthakatta
05-01 02:09 PM
Hi,
I have received my EAD recently and noticed that last name and first name are interchanged.
Does anyone know the process to get this corrected? Please let me know.
Thanks..Partha.
I have received my EAD recently and noticed that last name and first name are interchanged.
Does anyone know the process to get this corrected? Please let me know.
Thanks..Partha.
2011 hot Love Quotes Cute. Teens
pappu
03-19 12:19 PM
I happen to hear about one that a lot of doctors use . Check your pm
more...
Macaca
02-17 04:52 PM
Resources
Senators of the 110th Congress (http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm)
Organizational Chart (http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/reference/e_one_section_no_teasers/org_chart.htm)
Committees (http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/committees/d_three_sections_with_teasers/committees_home.htm)
Committee Assignments for the 110th Congress (http://www.senate.gov/general/committee_assignments/assignments.htm)
Legislation & Records (http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/legislative/g_three_sections_with_teasers/legislative_home.htm)
Active Legislation (http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/legislative/b_three_sections_with_teasers/active_leg_page.htm)
THOMAS (http://thomas.loc.gov/)
Last Major Action (http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bssQuery?&Db=110&stepID=S*&stepD=o&stepD1=20070227)
Bills Introduced (http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/R?d110:FLD010:+@eq+20070227)
Daily Digest (http://thomas.loc.gov/r110/r110d27fe7.html)
Roll Call Votes (http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/vote_menu_110_1.htm)
Legislative Calendar (http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/legislative/one_item_and_teasers/Senate_leg_calendar_page.htm)
Senate in Session (http://www.senate.gov/visiting/common/generic/Senate_in_session.htm)
Senators of the 110th Congress (http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm)
Organizational Chart (http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/reference/e_one_section_no_teasers/org_chart.htm)
Committees (http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/committees/d_three_sections_with_teasers/committees_home.htm)
Committee Assignments for the 110th Congress (http://www.senate.gov/general/committee_assignments/assignments.htm)
Legislation & Records (http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/legislative/g_three_sections_with_teasers/legislative_home.htm)
Active Legislation (http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/legislative/b_three_sections_with_teasers/active_leg_page.htm)
THOMAS (http://thomas.loc.gov/)
Last Major Action (http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bssQuery?&Db=110&stepID=S*&stepD=o&stepD1=20070227)
Bills Introduced (http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/R?d110:FLD010:+@eq+20070227)
Daily Digest (http://thomas.loc.gov/r110/r110d27fe7.html)
Roll Call Votes (http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/vote_menu_110_1.htm)
Legislative Calendar (http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/legislative/one_item_and_teasers/Senate_leg_calendar_page.htm)
Senate in Session (http://www.senate.gov/visiting/common/generic/Senate_in_session.htm)
haroontabrez
10-29 03:27 PM
Will I receive the actual AP document Or my attorney?
(My attorney filed for my AP).
Thanks.
(My attorney filed for my AP).
Thanks.
more...
pcs
06-14 03:59 PM
My earlier lawyer ( distant) missed 485 filing 2 years back & I do not want that to happen again.
Thanks
Thanks
2010 cute love quotes for teenagers
WAIT_FOR_EVER_GC
05-27 12:00 PM
When your passport expires, the visas on that passport are not cancelled. They remain valid.
I travelled to india and came back with the visa stamped on my old passport.
You are fine Sir.
I travelled to india and came back with the visa stamped on my old passport.
You are fine Sir.
more...
Macaca
06-01 07:26 PM
Pelosi�s Order in the House (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/01/us/politics/01web-hulse.html) By CARL HULSE (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/01/us/politics/01web-hulse.html), June 1, 2007
The differences between House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her predecessor, J. Dennis Hastert, could not be more striking.
He is a burly former wrestling coach, a conservative Republican from small-town Illinois who usually ran from the microphones. She is the designer-clad member of a political family, a wealthy liberal from San Francisco who sees herself as a top party spokeswoman.
But what could turn out to be their defining contrast was exhibited on May 24, when Ms. Pelosi allowed the Iraq war spending bill to clear the House with predominantly Republican votes while most Democrats � including her � opposed it. It was a marked departure from the principle that guided Mr. Hastert during his years as speaker.
Mr. Hastert was an advocate of governing the House by a �majority of the majority� � a standard he thought best served the interests of his Republican members and, by extension, the nation. Just months into her tenure, Ms. Pelosi has shown she will deviate from that approach, balancing the potential of significant rewards against big risks.
The rewards could come from success in winning approval of major legislation that reaches beyond party label. Critics of Mr. Hastert said his self-imposed rule prevented the House from considering centrist social and economic measures that, in their view, could have benefited both parties. It is likely, for instance, that a coalition existed in the House last year to pass an immigration overhaul that Republicans and Democrats could have hailed going into the elections. But strong opposition from a majority of the majority derailed that idea.
The risks are related to party cohesion. If a leader such as Ms. Pelosi regularly cuts against the wishes of most of the people who put her in leadership, it stands to reason they would eventually wonder if new leadership was warranted. At a more subtle level, passing important bills with coalitions built outside party lines can expose and deepen fractures within them and sap the support of interest groups that can be essential to winning and holding onto power.
Republicans see internal problems for Democrats as they sort through how to govern. �The problem for Pelosi is that the majority of her majority still has a minority mindset,� said John Feehery, a lobbyist who was an adviser to Mr. Hastert. �They would rather protest than legislate. And that dynamic will weaken her control over the House in the long-run."
While some anti-war groups remain outraged at the war vote, many Democrats were not all that upset with the way she handled it. Through some procedural maneuvers, the speaker allowed Democrats to back a minimum wage increase and popular domestic spending and still vote against the war money. At the same time, Democrats got out of what the leadership saw as a political jam that could have left them being blamed for cutting off money to troops overseas.
The next test for Ms. Pelosi will come on looming votes over increased free trade. Many - perhaps most - House Democrats are leery of going along with the push by President Bush, free-trading Democrats and congressional Republicans for new trade deals that they believe ship jobs out of the country and lack labor and environmental safeguards.
To some veteran House Democrats, the 1993 North American Free Trade Agreement is a particularly bitter memory. A majority of then-minority Republicans joined with a minority of then-majority Democrats to pass the deal sought by President Bill Clinton. Quite a few Democrats believe that approval of the trade deal over the objections of organized labor diluted union support in 1994 and contributed to the loss of Congress by the Democrats that year. Ms. Pelosi was among 102 Democrats who backed the 1993 trade deal; 156 Democrats, including the majority leader and whip, opposed it.
Anti-trade Democrats are worried the war vote foreshadowed Ms. Pelosi making a similar trade move this year, forgetting the hard lessons of NAFTA. They promise that such a decision will stir strong resentment. Ms. Pelosi has urged lawmakers not to jump to conclusions, but she is making no guarantees that legislation must have majority Democratic backing.
�I have to take into consideration something broader than the majority of the majority in the Democratic Caucus,� she told reporters.
The differences between House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her predecessor, J. Dennis Hastert, could not be more striking.
He is a burly former wrestling coach, a conservative Republican from small-town Illinois who usually ran from the microphones. She is the designer-clad member of a political family, a wealthy liberal from San Francisco who sees herself as a top party spokeswoman.
But what could turn out to be their defining contrast was exhibited on May 24, when Ms. Pelosi allowed the Iraq war spending bill to clear the House with predominantly Republican votes while most Democrats � including her � opposed it. It was a marked departure from the principle that guided Mr. Hastert during his years as speaker.
Mr. Hastert was an advocate of governing the House by a �majority of the majority� � a standard he thought best served the interests of his Republican members and, by extension, the nation. Just months into her tenure, Ms. Pelosi has shown she will deviate from that approach, balancing the potential of significant rewards against big risks.
The rewards could come from success in winning approval of major legislation that reaches beyond party label. Critics of Mr. Hastert said his self-imposed rule prevented the House from considering centrist social and economic measures that, in their view, could have benefited both parties. It is likely, for instance, that a coalition existed in the House last year to pass an immigration overhaul that Republicans and Democrats could have hailed going into the elections. But strong opposition from a majority of the majority derailed that idea.
The risks are related to party cohesion. If a leader such as Ms. Pelosi regularly cuts against the wishes of most of the people who put her in leadership, it stands to reason they would eventually wonder if new leadership was warranted. At a more subtle level, passing important bills with coalitions built outside party lines can expose and deepen fractures within them and sap the support of interest groups that can be essential to winning and holding onto power.
Republicans see internal problems for Democrats as they sort through how to govern. �The problem for Pelosi is that the majority of her majority still has a minority mindset,� said John Feehery, a lobbyist who was an adviser to Mr. Hastert. �They would rather protest than legislate. And that dynamic will weaken her control over the House in the long-run."
While some anti-war groups remain outraged at the war vote, many Democrats were not all that upset with the way she handled it. Through some procedural maneuvers, the speaker allowed Democrats to back a minimum wage increase and popular domestic spending and still vote against the war money. At the same time, Democrats got out of what the leadership saw as a political jam that could have left them being blamed for cutting off money to troops overseas.
The next test for Ms. Pelosi will come on looming votes over increased free trade. Many - perhaps most - House Democrats are leery of going along with the push by President Bush, free-trading Democrats and congressional Republicans for new trade deals that they believe ship jobs out of the country and lack labor and environmental safeguards.
To some veteran House Democrats, the 1993 North American Free Trade Agreement is a particularly bitter memory. A majority of then-minority Republicans joined with a minority of then-majority Democrats to pass the deal sought by President Bill Clinton. Quite a few Democrats believe that approval of the trade deal over the objections of organized labor diluted union support in 1994 and contributed to the loss of Congress by the Democrats that year. Ms. Pelosi was among 102 Democrats who backed the 1993 trade deal; 156 Democrats, including the majority leader and whip, opposed it.
Anti-trade Democrats are worried the war vote foreshadowed Ms. Pelosi making a similar trade move this year, forgetting the hard lessons of NAFTA. They promise that such a decision will stir strong resentment. Ms. Pelosi has urged lawmakers not to jump to conclusions, but she is making no guarantees that legislation must have majority Democratic backing.
�I have to take into consideration something broader than the majority of the majority in the Democratic Caucus,� she told reporters.
hair love quotes for teenagers.
automaton2
April 13th, 2006, 01:54 PM
hope these help
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1034&message=11525460 (http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1034&message=11525460) <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>
http://www.pbase.com/dlcmh/af_ae_config (http://www.pbase.com/dlcmh/af_ae_config)
<o:p> </o:p>
http://leongoodman.tripod.com/d70focuspart4.html#The_D70_Manual_is_very_confusin g_about (http://leongoodman.tripod.com/d70focuspart4.html#The_D70_Manual_is_very_confusin g_about) <o:p></o:p>
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1034&message=11525460 (http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1034&message=11525460) <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>
http://www.pbase.com/dlcmh/af_ae_config (http://www.pbase.com/dlcmh/af_ae_config)
<o:p> </o:p>
http://leongoodman.tripod.com/d70focuspart4.html#The_D70_Manual_is_very_confusin g_about (http://leongoodman.tripod.com/d70focuspart4.html#The_D70_Manual_is_very_confusin g_about) <o:p></o:p>