GIDOC
07-17 11:48 PM
If you have been stuck for 3 years in name check then think about WOM.
wallpaper Blake Lively Hot Pics
immi2006
06-26 10:05 AM
Folks,
Please search for ur query, this has been answered many times in this area
Please search for ur query, this has been answered many times in this area
.jpg "Blake Lively")
neha_mittal
02-10 02:56 PM
Hi -
I got my I-140 approved back in 2008 and last year my H1b was extended for another 3 years.
I am planning to change job now and once the new company transfers my H1b will it be extended for another 3 years or for the remaining duration of my current H1B.
Also what happens if my current employer revoke the I-140 after i change job?
Until when can i start the GC process with new company so that i don't go out of status and keep getting extensions until i get my GC?
Thanks
I got my I-140 approved back in 2008 and last year my H1b was extended for another 3 years.
I am planning to change job now and once the new company transfers my H1b will it be extended for another 3 years or for the remaining duration of my current H1B.
Also what happens if my current employer revoke the I-140 after i change job?
Until when can i start the GC process with new company so that i don't go out of status and keep getting extensions until i get my GC?
Thanks
2011 Blake Lively Pics | EgoTV
fire_hs_1
07-14 04:16 PM
I got my labor and 140 cleared few months back under EB3, Can I apply for 765 to get my EAD ?
I have not applied for 485.
Please let me know.
thanks
I have not applied for 485.
Please let me know.
thanks
more...
mannishk
09-28 10:08 PM
Hello Attorney`s
I am in a weird situation here, I was Laid off on July 21st with pay in lieu until 4th August. I had applied for Change of Status to F2 (my wife is on F1) on 17th August. On 31st August I got a job offer and applied for H1B transfer to USCIS on 8th September (using 15th august paystub as the latest).
At the same time i filed to USCIS to revoke my F2 application.
Today I got a notice from USCIS that my application for change of status to F2 is approved as of 09/21/2009.
Now, I dont know what to do, does it mean I am now on F2? Is my H1B transfer application still valid or I need to apply again this time on premium processing.
What should be my next course of action. Any help in this regard would be highly appreciated.
Thanks so much..!!
Have a great day..!
I am in a weird situation here, I was Laid off on July 21st with pay in lieu until 4th August. I had applied for Change of Status to F2 (my wife is on F1) on 17th August. On 31st August I got a job offer and applied for H1B transfer to USCIS on 8th September (using 15th august paystub as the latest).
At the same time i filed to USCIS to revoke my F2 application.
Today I got a notice from USCIS that my application for change of status to F2 is approved as of 09/21/2009.
Now, I dont know what to do, does it mean I am now on F2? Is my H1B transfer application still valid or I need to apply again this time on premium processing.
What should be my next course of action. Any help in this regard would be highly appreciated.
Thanks so much..!!
Have a great day..!
ramus
05-31 10:01 PM
Can you please close one of your thread.. Seems like we have dulicate thred.
I think they will consider PD of perm labor which was approved and not the one you filed in 2005...
other can give their view..
If you get chance could you please send web-fax and contribute small amount if you can...
Thanks a lot
I think they will consider PD of perm labor which was approved and not the one you filed in 2005...
other can give their view..
If you get chance could you please send web-fax and contribute small amount if you can...
Thanks a lot
more...
pttuanzhang
06-02 07:49 PM
You're right, I really admire
2010 Blake Lively
RMF
08-17 02:57 PM
http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/ReceiptingTimes081707.pdf
Changed the link and tried, seems to work.
Hope it is the right one.
Changed the link and tried, seems to work.
Hope it is the right one.
more...
bhasky25
01-15 05:16 PM
Thanks. The A#, DOB and photo are correct on the card. Can I use the EAD card and at the same time file for a correction.
Do I have to pay again for the correction ?
Do I have to pay again for the correction ?
hair reported that Blake Lively
vat
12-24 08:22 PM
I have a situation here.
I am on H1B visa and just changed my job in September.
My H1B transfer (thru my new company) was approved and according to USCIS website, they have dispatched my 797-Notice of Action. But I am yet to receive those papers.
Now, I was on extension of H1B earlier (thru my old company), as my stamped visa expired.
Now, my spouse needs to visit India urgently. Can she travel to India with her old I-94 (the one that was stapled on the passport when she entered US the last time) and the other I-94 that she has with the visa extension papers ?? Of course, once we get the new Form 797, I shall also travel to India and we both will get our visa stamping done before we travel back to USA. Please suggest...
I am on H1B visa and just changed my job in September.
My H1B transfer (thru my new company) was approved and according to USCIS website, they have dispatched my 797-Notice of Action. But I am yet to receive those papers.
Now, I was on extension of H1B earlier (thru my old company), as my stamped visa expired.
Now, my spouse needs to visit India urgently. Can she travel to India with her old I-94 (the one that was stapled on the passport when she entered US the last time) and the other I-94 that she has with the visa extension papers ?? Of course, once we get the new Form 797, I shall also travel to India and we both will get our visa stamping done before we travel back to USA. Please suggest...
more...
Macaca
03-18 07:25 AM
Some paras from Congress's Oversight Offensive (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/16/AR2007031601989.html), By David S. Broder (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/david+s.+broder/), Sunday, March 18, 2007
Ten weeks into the new Congress, it is clear that revelation, not legislation, is going to be its real product.
While President Bush threatens to use his veto pen to stop some bills and Senate Republicans block other measures from even reaching his desk, no force in Washington can halt the Democrats' investigative juggernaut from uncovering the secrets inside this administration.
For the first six years of the Bush administration, these aides were allowed free rein to carry out whatever policy or political assignments they wished -- or supposed that the president wanted done. A Congress under firm Republican control was somnolent when it came to oversight of the executive branch. No Republican committee chairman wanted to turn over rocks in a Republican administration.
You have to feel a twinge of sympathy now for the Bush appointees who suddenly find unsympathetic Democratic chairmen such as Henry Waxman, John Conyers, Patrick Leahy and Carl Levin investigating their cases. Even if those appointees are scrupulously careful about their actions now, who knows what subpoenaed memos and e-mails in their files will reveal about the past?
They will pay the price for the temporary breakdown in the system of checks and balances that occurred between 2001 and this year -- when the Republican Congress forgot its responsibility to hold the executive branch accountable.
It was a fundamental dereliction of duty by Congress, and it probably did more to encourage bad decisions and harmful actions by executive-branch political appointees than the much-touted lobbying influence. In reality, many Republican members of Congress did not mind what was happening because they were able to get favors done in that permissive climate. Now, the Democratic investigators will publicize instances of influence by members of Congress, and the political fallout will not stop with New Mexico's Pete Domenici and Heather Wilson.
Democrats find it easier to investigate than to legislate. With their major initiatives, from a minimum-wage boost to a shutdown of the Iraq war, stymied by Republican opposition, the Democrats are understandably making "accountability" their new goal -- meaning more and more investigations.
Fulfilling that promise, later in the week the House passed a series of bills that stripped some of the secrecy from executive branch documents and decisions.
Accountability is certainly important, but Democrats must know that people were really voting for action on Iraq, health care, immigration, energy and a few other problems. Investigations are useful, but only legislation on big issues changes lives.
Ten weeks into the new Congress, it is clear that revelation, not legislation, is going to be its real product.
While President Bush threatens to use his veto pen to stop some bills and Senate Republicans block other measures from even reaching his desk, no force in Washington can halt the Democrats' investigative juggernaut from uncovering the secrets inside this administration.
For the first six years of the Bush administration, these aides were allowed free rein to carry out whatever policy or political assignments they wished -- or supposed that the president wanted done. A Congress under firm Republican control was somnolent when it came to oversight of the executive branch. No Republican committee chairman wanted to turn over rocks in a Republican administration.
You have to feel a twinge of sympathy now for the Bush appointees who suddenly find unsympathetic Democratic chairmen such as Henry Waxman, John Conyers, Patrick Leahy and Carl Levin investigating their cases. Even if those appointees are scrupulously careful about their actions now, who knows what subpoenaed memos and e-mails in their files will reveal about the past?
They will pay the price for the temporary breakdown in the system of checks and balances that occurred between 2001 and this year -- when the Republican Congress forgot its responsibility to hold the executive branch accountable.
It was a fundamental dereliction of duty by Congress, and it probably did more to encourage bad decisions and harmful actions by executive-branch political appointees than the much-touted lobbying influence. In reality, many Republican members of Congress did not mind what was happening because they were able to get favors done in that permissive climate. Now, the Democratic investigators will publicize instances of influence by members of Congress, and the political fallout will not stop with New Mexico's Pete Domenici and Heather Wilson.
Democrats find it easier to investigate than to legislate. With their major initiatives, from a minimum-wage boost to a shutdown of the Iraq war, stymied by Republican opposition, the Democrats are understandably making "accountability" their new goal -- meaning more and more investigations.
Fulfilling that promise, later in the week the House passed a series of bills that stripped some of the secrecy from executive branch documents and decisions.
Accountability is certainly important, but Democrats must know that people were really voting for action on Iraq, health care, immigration, energy and a few other problems. Investigations are useful, but only legislation on big issues changes lives.
hot Blake Christina Lively Height
coolfun
01-28 12:49 AM
Hi,
Gurus - I have few questions and I need your help:
1. My EAD/AP expires in June/July '08. Can I apply for their renewal now?
2. Will there be a finger-printing requirement for the renewal? We had finger print in June 2007 when we applied 485/765/131 together?
3. Is it better to efile or paper file?
4. I will be in India from April to June this year. I have an AP valid till end June. Can I file for EAD/AP renewal and leave for India in April. Is there any risk? I can still use my current AP to enter when I come in early June, right?
Thanks so much.
Gurus - I have few questions and I need your help:
1. My EAD/AP expires in June/July '08. Can I apply for their renewal now?
2. Will there be a finger-printing requirement for the renewal? We had finger print in June 2007 when we applied 485/765/131 together?
3. Is it better to efile or paper file?
4. I will be in India from April to June this year. I have an AP valid till end June. Can I file for EAD/AP renewal and leave for India in April. Is there any risk? I can still use my current AP to enter when I come in early June, right?
Thanks so much.
more...
house Blake Lively
nuke
03-18 11:11 PM
I have to file a loan application which requires me to state if I am a Lawful Permanent resident alien or not; and I am not sure if I am, can somebody please clarify if I am a Lawful Permanent resident alien or not if I have a pening I-485 application and I am working on EAD?
Thanks.
Thanks.
tattoo lake lively image
Bark
03-22 09:34 AM
My apologies for posting this to the wrong section of the forum. Hopefully you will forgive a newbie. Bark
more...
pictures Blake Lively Penn Badgley
nicpearcenrs
03-18 11:31 PM
Most of the people facing this same problem. But some body got the solution. Some body can not get solution. If you get the solution please share that information to everyone. It is very helpful for who are facing the same problem.
Thank you
..............
Nic
Payroll India (http://www.topsyssolutions.com)
Thank you
..............
Nic
Payroll India (http://www.topsyssolutions.com)
dresses In interview, Blake revealed
anzarafaq
06-16 02:17 PM
Hi,
My I-140 was approved in May and I am still waiting for I-485 approval. I filed in August 2007 concurrently and my Priority Date is June 2004.
I thought that concurrent filing will also mean concurrent approval, but may be this is not the case. Otherwise should I call NSC and ask them about it (whats the best way to call them ?)
Thanks
:confused:
My I-140 was approved in May and I am still waiting for I-485 approval. I filed in August 2007 concurrently and my Priority Date is June 2004.
I thought that concurrent filing will also mean concurrent approval, but may be this is not the case. Otherwise should I call NSC and ask them about it (whats the best way to call them ?)
Thanks
:confused:
more...
makeup Blake Lively : Blake Lively
fromnaija
09-30 06:00 PM
Her H4 is not dependent upon the employer but on her spouse maintaining a valid H1 with an employer. There is no need for your wife's friend to worry or do anything.
However, if she wants to get a visa stamp, she would have to go with her husband's current H1 I797 at that time.
However, if she wants to get a visa stamp, she would have to go with her husband's current H1 I797 at that time.
girlfriend Blake Lively in Vogue - TV
Blog Feeds
01-20 08:10 AM
A fat report and one with some helpful recommendations and statistics. Here are some of the more interesting items I found - - Of the top 150 H-1B employers, 24 were deemed H-1B dependent (a high percentage of workers on the H-1B) and 9 had prior H-1B violations. - Real earnings growth for US workers in occupations with proportionately more H-1B workers - particularly IT - was actually much stronger than the general US worker. - Engineers and IT professionals on H-1Bs were more than twice as likely as their US counterparts to have advanced degrees. - The proportion of...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2011/01/government-accountability-office-releases-report-on-h-1b-program.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2011/01/government-accountability-office-releases-report-on-h-1b-program.html)
hairstyles Blake Lively Pics | EgoTV
hsm2007
10-12 09:09 PM
Guys,
I had received FP notice 2 days ago and my FP date is after 3 weeks. I was getting ready to try to do it early but I just received Card Production Ordered email for both my spouse and myself. What do I do now? Do I need to still go for the FP after 3 weeks.
I am not sure why they would send me the FP notice if they wanted to approve my GC.
I had received FP notice 2 days ago and my FP date is after 3 weeks. I was getting ready to try to do it early but I just received Card Production Ordered email for both my spouse and myself. What do I do now? Do I need to still go for the FP after 3 weeks.
I am not sure why they would send me the FP notice if they wanted to approve my GC.
anantken
07-15 03:15 PM
Hi,
I have applied I-485 in July 2007. My Priority date is May22, 2006 (which is current as per August VISA Bulletin). But I haven't received the Finger Printing notice yet !!
I also went to Local Office but they also couldn't help me.
What I am suppose to do in that case?
I have applied I-485 in July 2007. My Priority date is May22, 2006 (which is current as per August VISA Bulletin). But I haven't received the Finger Printing notice yet !!
I also went to Local Office but they also couldn't help me.
What I am suppose to do in that case?
paulinasmith
08-05 12:18 AM
Hi,
Normally for non auditted PERM cases only employer can check the status.
Try : Welcome to the iCERT Portal (http://icert.doleta.gov/)
icert case status check on the above link
Cheers
Normally for non auditted PERM cases only employer can check the status.
Try : Welcome to the iCERT Portal (http://icert.doleta.gov/)
icert case status check on the above link
Cheers
No comments:
Post a Comment